Skip to main content
Skip to current response
Back to Community

how to define succes

Community

Starting question

how to define succes

Then AI response

What Counts as Success?

No source links recorded for this answer.

“Success” is not a single thing but a family of ideas. How you define it depends on your values, aims, and the standards you accept. Below are concise philosophical perspectives and a short practical method to form your own definition. Philosophical perspectives - Eudaimonic (flourishing): Success = living well and realizing your human capacities (Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics). - Hedonic/welfare: Success = maximizing pleasure or well‑being and minimizing suffering (classical utilitarianism; Mill). - Virtue/character: Success = cultivating moral and intellectual virtues and acting rightly (virtue ethics). - Existential/authenticity: Success = choosing freely, taking responsibility, and living authentically in accordance with self‑created meaning (Sartre; Frankl on meaning). - Social/relational: Success = contributing to others and sustaining meaningful relationships (care ethics, capability approach — Sen). Practical way to define your personal success 1. Name core values (e.g., autonomy, connection, mastery, contribution). 2. Translate each value into specific outcomes or capacities (what would it look like if realized?). 3. Choose measurable indicators and time frames (SMART where helpful). 4. Weigh trade‑offs explicitly (which values can be sacrificed, which are non‑negotiable). 5. Revisit and revise periodically; life circumstances change what’s reasonable or desirable. Common pitfalls - Adopting others’ metrics (status, wealth) without reflection. - Narrow short‑term wins that harm long‑term flourishing. - Equating success only with external recognition. Example succinct definitions - “Success = sustained personal growth and contributing to others’ well‑being.” - “Success = meeting my chosen goals while living by my core values.” References (select) - Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics. - John Stuart Mill, Utilitarianism. - Viktor E. Frankl, Man’s Search for Meaning. - Jean-Paul Sartre, Existentialism Is a Humanism. - Amartya Sen, Development as Freedom (capability approach). If you want, tell me two values you care about and I’ll help craft a short, personalized definition of success.

Select text to highlight passages.

Then Thought · Participant

Explain: Social/relational: Success = contributing to others and sustaining meaningful relationships (care ethics, capability approach — Sen).

Select text to highlight passages.

Then AI response

The Social/Relational Conception of Success

No source links recorded for this answer.

What it says, simply - Success is primarily assessed by your relationships and the difference you make in other people’s lives. It centers on contribution, care, mutual support, and the quality of social bonds rather than only on individual achievement or pleasure. Philosophical grounding - Care ethics (e.g., Carol Gilligan; Nel Noddings): moral worth is grounded in concrete relationships and responsibilities of care. Ethical success is demonstrated by responsiveness, attentiveness, and sustaining caring practices within families and communities. - Capability approach (Amartya Sen; Martha Nussbaum): justice and success are about the real freedoms people have to do and be what they value. Social structures and relationships matter because they enable (or block) others’ capabilities. How it differs from other views - Not purely hedonic: it values relational goods even when they require sacrifice. - Not purely individualistic: success is interdependent—one person’s flourishing is tied to others’ conditions and opportunities. - Not merely status/wealth: emphasis is on meaningful connection, mutual recognition, and enabling others’ agency. Practical implications and indicators - Focus on practices: caregiving, mentoring, civic engagement, sustaining trust. - Measurable signs: number/depth of close relationships, perceived social support, reciprocity, opportunities you help create for others, and indicators of others’ flourishing (health, education, autonomy). - Tools: relational well‑being surveys, social capital measures, capability checklists. Common objections and replies - “Too demanding/other‑neglecting”: reply — a relational account can include self‑care as part of sustaining relationships; boundaries and reciprocity are integral. - “Paternalistic”: reply — capability emphasis stresses enabling others’ choices, not imposing ends. Short example - Definition: “Success = being a dependable caregiver, mentor, and community participant who helps others develop real opportunities to thrive.” Indicators: consistent time for loved ones, mentees’ progress, community projects supported, and mutual satisfaction ratings. Select sources - Carol Gilligan, In a Different Voice (1982); Nel Noddings, Caring: A Relational Approach to Ethics and Moral Education (1984). - Amartya Sen, Development as Freedom (1999); Martha Nussbaum, Creating Capabilities (2011).

Select text to highlight passages.

Continue this thread

This path ends here for now.

Share your perspective, offer an example, or ask a follow-up to continue the discussion.

Other paths you could read

Earlier, at What Counts as Success?, the conversation split. If this is not the thread you want, you can switch to one of the other paths below.

Grid tools

Reading style
Answer level

Expanded · new AI answers

Answer level

Visibility

Public · who can view

Visibility

Anyone can find and view this grid. Only the owner can change visibility.

Sign in for grid updates
Activity

Questions, additions, and edits

No activity yet

Export

Download your grid

Translate

Read this node in other languages

Highlights

0 saved passages and connected ideas

No highlights yet

Select text to save it here.