Reader

This has probably come up before but I like different opinions and perspectives Do you prefer to fast travel or actually ridewalk to your intended destination

Read

Grid

Ask a question

Starting question

This has probably come up before but I like different opinions and perspectives Do you prefer to fast travel or actually ridewalk to your intended destination

Then Answer

Fast Travel vs. Riding — Which I Prefer

No source links recorded for this answer.

I prefer actually riding/walking to my destination. It yields richer experiences: discovery of unexpected encounters, environmental storytelling, skill/practice (navigation, attention), and a stronger sense of place and accomplishment. Fast travel is useful when time is scarce or the route is repetitive, but it trades away immersion and serendipity. References: - Game design discussion on exploration vs. convenience: Marc Laidlaw, “Why Traversal Matters” (various essays); see also academic work on player motivation and exploration (e.g., Przybylski et al., 2010 on autonomy and engagement).

Select text to highlight passages.

Challenge this answer

Then Con / Counterpoint

In Defense of the Journey — Against Fast Travel

No source links recorded for this answer.

Fast travel may be convenient, but choosing to ride or walk preserves what makes virtual worlds meaningful. First, slower traversal fosters discovery: unplanned encounters and environmental details create narrative depth and reward curiosity (Laidlaw’s essays on traversal highlight how movement can convey story). Second, the act of traveling trains attention and skill—navigation, situational awareness, and tactical decision-making—that deepen engagement and player competence (research on autonomy and engagement, e.g. Przybylski et al., 2010, links active choice to sustained motivation). Third, moving through space builds a stronger sense of place and accomplishment: reaching a distant destination on foot produces memorable experiences and personal narratives that a teleportation shortcut cannot replicate. Fast travel has a role when repetition or time constraints make traversal tedious, but it is a trade-off: convenience for immersion and serendipity. If designers care about exploration, presence, and meaningful play, they should make the journey worth taking rather than give players a constant excuse to skip it. References: - Marc Laidlaw, essays on traversal and level design (e.g., “Why Traversal Matters” discussions) - Przybylski, A. K., Rigby, C. S., & Ryan, R. M. (2010). A motivational model of video game engagement (on autonomy and engagement).

Select text to highlight passages.