are there any city states in the world? how are they holding up

While the foundation established the economic and political viability of city-states, their physical and operational security requires a specialized approach to defense. Lacking **strategic depth**—the distance between the front line and core population or industrial centers—these entities cannot survive a war of attrition. Consequently, they employ multi-layered security frameworks that blend military deterrence, diplomatic entanglement, and specialized protection treaties. ## Asymmetric Deterrence and the Poison Shrimp Doctrine Small sovereign entities often adopt an **asymmetric defense strategy**. This is most clearly seen in Singapore’s military evolution. Historically, the state followed the "Poison Shrimp" doctrine: the notion that while a larger power might consume the city-state, it would suffer such catastrophic damage in the process that the effort would be counterproductive. 1. **Total Defense:** This framework expands security beyond the military to include civil, social, psychological, and economic resilience. It ensures that the entire citizenry is mobilized to maintain essential services during a crisis. 2. **Technological Overmatch:** To compensate for a small population, city-states invest heavily in high-end military technology, such as advanced unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and sophisticated missile defense systems, to maintain a qualitative edge over numerically superior neighbors. 3. **Conscription:** Singapore utilizes universal male conscription (National Service) to maintain a large, ready reserve force, ensuring that the city can pivot rapidly from a civilian to a military footing. ## Diplomatic Entanglement: The Gulliver Strategy The **Gulliver Strategy** involves a small state "tying down" larger powers through a complex web of international agreements, trade dependencies, and institutional memberships. By making their survival vital to the economic health of the global community, city-states create a disincentive for aggression. - **Global Financial Nodes:** By hosting the regional headquarters of multinational corporations and holding vast amounts of foreign capital, city-states ensure that a conventional attack on their territory would trigger a global financial crisis, prompting intervention from major world powers. - **Strategic Neutrality:** Maintaining a status as a neutral venue for international mediation allows city-states to become "indispensable intermediaries," providing a level of diplomatic protection that military hardware cannot. ## Security Delegation and Protectorate Arrangements In Europe, the security of city-states is often formally managed through **bilateral protection treaties**. This allows the city-state to maintain sovereignty without the exorbitant cost of a standing army. - **Monaco:** Under the Treaty of 1918 and its 2002 revision, France is responsible for the defense of Monaco. While Monaco maintains a small ceremonial guard and police force, its external security is fundamentally a French responsibility. - **Vatican City:** The security of the Pope and the enclave is handled by the **Pontifical Swiss Guard**, a specialized military unit. However, the external defense of the territory and the policing of St. Peter's Square are largely coordinated with the Italian state, demonstrating a symbiotic security relationship. ## Digital and Infrastructure Hardening In the contemporary era, the primary threat to a city-state is often non-kinetic. Because their power is concentrated in digital and physical infrastructure—such as ports, server farms, and desalination plants—they lead in **cyber-defense** and **critical infrastructure protection**. For these entities, a cyber-attack on their financial clearinghouses is as existential a threat as a conventional blockade.