Understanding Neo-tribes

Neo-tribes refer to loosely connected, ephemeral groups that arise from shared interests, lifestyles, or cultural practices rather than fixed, traditional identities. Unlike conventional tribal systems that are based on longstanding ties, neo-tribes are fluid and transient, often formed around modern consumer habits, digital communities, or evolving subcultures. They emphasize identity as a process of continuous reconfiguration, reflecting postmodern ideas about the fragmented, ever-changing nature of contemporary social life.

View Branch

Identity as a Fluid, Ever-Changing Process

In postmodern thought, identity is seen not as a static label but as an ongoing, dynamic process of self-construction. This implies that individuals continuously adapt and reshape their identities in response to changing cultural, social, and personal influences.

Instead of being fixed or defined by traditional roles, people engage in a constant reconfiguration of self—much like members of neo-tribes who embrace shifting affiliations and practices. This idea reflects the postmodern view of our fragmented, evolving social reality, where identity is perpetually open-ended and flexible rather than predetermined or singular.

View Branch

Origins and Scholarly Developments of the Neo-tribes Concept

Michel Maffesoli is widely credited with popularizing the term “neo-tribes” in his analyses of postmodern social life, particularly in his work The Time of the Tribes. Since then, other scholars—such as Zygmunt Bauman, who explores the fluidity of social forms in his idea of “liquid modernity,” and Judith Butler, whose work on the performative and continuously constructed nature of identity resonates with the neo-tribe framework—have contributed to understanding these shifting groupings. Various cultural theorists and sociologists have also continued to develop the concept, examining how mobile, transient communities reflect the evolving, fragmented character of contemporary identities.

View Branch