1. Prevention and education
  • Online awareness campaigns, apps, and social media tools to teach consent, bystander intervention, and healthy relationships. (WHO, UN Women resources)
  • School and workplace e-learning modules that use interactive scenarios and gamification to change norms.
  1. Early warning and reporting
  • Anonymous, easy-to-use reporting apps and hotlines linking victims to support and law enforcement (integrate location, evidence upload, multi-language).
  • Panic/duress features on smartphones and wearables that send silent alerts with GPS and audio to trusted contacts or authorities.
  1. Safety-safe design and public infrastructure
  • Smart city lighting, CCTV with privacy-respecting AI that detects suspicious behavior in high-risk areas and alerts responders.
  • Safer transport tech: live-tracking, driver/passenger verification, in-ride emergency buttons for taxis/rideshares.
  1. Evidence collection and forensics
  • Secure cloud storage and chain-of-custody tools for photos, messages, and medical records to strengthen prosecutions.
  • Forensic tools (e.g., validated digital evidence extraction) to improve conviction rates while protecting victims’ privacy.
  1. Support services and access to resources
  • Telemedicine and telecounseling platforms for immediate medical and psychological help.
  • Platforms that connect survivors to legal aid, shelters, and financial assistance, using AI to triage and personalize recommendations.
  1. Data, policy, and accountability
  • Anonymous data collection and analytics to identify hotspots, evaluate interventions, and guide policy while preserving confidentiality.
  • Technology to monitor institutional compliance (schools, workplaces) with anti-harassment policies.
  1. Ethical safeguards
  • Privacy-by-design, consent-based data practices, and community governance to avoid retraumatization, surveillance abuse, or victim-blaming. (See: UNESCO, UN Women guidelines)

Key caveat: Technology is a tool — it must be combined with legal reform, community engagement, and cultural change to be effective.

Technology can play a powerful, pragmatic role in reducing violence against women when deployed ethically and alongside legal, social, and cultural change.

  1. Prevention and education
  • Digital campaigns, apps, and social media selectively disseminate evidence-based content on consent, bystander intervention, and healthy relationships (see WHO, UN Women resources).
  • Interactive e-learning and gamified modules in schools and workplaces can shift norms and build skills at scale.
  1. Early warning and reporting
  • Simple, anonymous reporting apps and multilingual hotlines that allow location, evidence upload, and secure linking to services lower barriers to seeking help.
  • Smartphone and wearable panic/duress features can silently send GPS, audio, and alerts to trusted contacts or responders, reducing response time and risk.
  1. Safety-focused public design
  • Smart-city tools — adaptive lighting and privacy-respecting CCTV with AI to detect suspicious movement — can increase safety in known high-risk areas without mass surveillance.
  • Safer transport tech (live-tracking, identity verification, in-ride emergency buttons) reduces risk in taxis and rideshares.
  1. Evidence collection and forensics
  • Secure cloud storage and validated chain-of-custody systems for photos, messages, and medical records strengthen prosecutions while preserving evidence integrity.
  • Forensic tools for extracting and validating digital evidence can improve conviction rates when paired with trauma-informed procedures.
  1. Support services and access to resources
  • Telemedicine and telecounseling provide immediate medical and psychological care for survivors, especially in underserved areas.
  • Platforms connecting survivors to legal aid, shelters, and financial support — using AI ethically to triage and personalize referrals — increase access to comprehensive assistance.
  1. Data, policy, and accountability
  • Anonymized data analytics identify hotspots, measure intervention effectiveness, and guide resource allocation while protecting confidentiality.
  • Digital monitoring systems can track institutional compliance with anti-harassment policies in workplaces and schools.
  1. Ethical safeguards
  • Privacy-by-design, consent-based data practices, strong encryption, and community governance are essential to prevent retraumatization, surveillance abuse, or victim-blaming (see UNESCO and UN Women guidelines).
  • Transparency, human oversight, and avenues for redress must accompany any technological solution.

Key caveat Technology is a tool, not a panacea. Lasting reduction in violence against women requires integrated approaches: legal reform, survivor-centered services, community engagement, and cultural change alongside carefully governed technological interventions.

Selected references

  • World Health Organization: Responding to intimate partner violence and sexual violence against women (2013)
  • UN Women: Technology and innovation to prevent and respond to gender-based violence (guidance materials)
  • UNESCO: Guidelines on ethics and privacy for tech interventions related to gender-based violence

Technology offers useful tools, but overreliance on it as a primary strategy for reducing violence against women is problematic. Here are the main objections:

  1. Technological fixes can obscure root causes
  • Violence against women is driven by gender norms, power imbalances, economic dependency, and weak legal enforcement. Apps and sensors do not change misogynistic attitudes or structural inequalities; they may treat symptoms rather than causes. (See WHO findings on social determinants of violence.)
  1. Risk of increased surveillance and control
  • Measures framed as “safety” (tracking, pervasive cameras, monitoring apps) can be repurposed to surveil and control women, especially by intimate partners, families, or authoritarian states. Surveillance disproportionately harms marginalized groups and can exacerbate vulnerability. (Cf. critiques of surveillance feminism; UN guidance on digital safety.)
  1. Privacy, security, and retraumatization concerns
  • Digital reporting and evidence tools can expose survivors to data breaches, doxxing, or misuse of intimate evidence in court. Poorly designed systems can retraumatize survivors through intrusive questioning, forced uploads, or lack of data-minimization practices. Robust privacy-by-design is rare in practice.
  1. Unequal access and digital divides
  • Marginalized women—rural, low-income, older, disabled, or undocumented—often lack access to smartphones, reliable connectivity, or tech literacy. Tech solutions risk privileging those already relatively empowered, widening disparities in protection and support.
  1. False sense of security and displacement of responsibility
  • Governments and institutions may adopt technological measures to appear proactive while cutting investments in social services, policing reforms, education, and shelters. Reliance on tech can let policymakers avoid the harder work of legal reform and cultural change.
  1. Effectiveness and unintended consequences
  • Many safety apps and prevention tools have limited evidence of real-world effectiveness in reducing violence or improving prosecution rates. Panic buttons or cameras can provoke escalation by an abuser if detected. Automated detection systems can generate false positives/negatives, misallocating resources or stigmatizing innocent behavior.

Conclusion Technology can supplement a comprehensive strategy but cannot substitute for legal reform, education, economic empowerment, community mobilization, and accountable institutions. Prioritizing tech-centric responses risks surveillance harms, inequitable protection, and neglect of the social transformations necessary to prevent violence against women.

References (selective)

  • World Health Organization, “Violence against women” evidence and prevention frameworks.
  • UN Women / UNESCO guidance on digital safety and privacy-by-design.
  • Scholarly critiques of surveillance solutions to gendered violence (e.g., articles on surveillance feminism and digital harm).
Back to Graph