The Pitfalls of Overanalyzing Lisp Semantics
One might argue against striving for a rigid understanding of Lisp’s semantics because its strength lies precisely in its flexibility. Lisp blurs the line between code and data, encouraging a dynamic, experimental approach rather than a fixed, formal interpretation. By attempting to pin down its semantics too strictly, we risk overlooking the language’s creative potential—its power to let programmers redefine and extend its behavior programmatically. In this view, embracing the fluid, context-dependent nature of Lisp can be more fruitful than constraining it within narrowly defined semantic rules.