Plato’s critique of democracy hinges on the assumption that wisdom and virtue are rare and best concentrated in a select few (philosopher-kings). However, this view is elitist and underestimates the collective wisdom of the populace. Democracy, while imperfect, allows for diverse perspectives and self-correction through debate and participation. Plato’s fear of chaos overlooks the fact that democratic systems often balance freedom with accountability, preventing tyranny more effectively than a centralized meritocracy, which risks authoritarianism if the “wise” rulers become corrupt or detached from the people’s needs.