While the convergence of ideas in Andrew Wiles’s proof of Fermat’s Last Theorem is undeniably impressive, one may argue that viewing these successes as philosophically unified oversimplifies the intricate nature of mathematical discovery. Each theorem in number theory emerged from deep, specialized inquiries, rather than from a preordained, overarching framework. The relationships among results—such as those linking elliptic curves to modular forms—might be seen as serendipitous intersections borne of technical necessity rather than evidence of an inherent, unified beauty in mathematics. Thus, rather than revealing an underlying philosophical unity, these interconnected resolutions could simply reflect the evolving, patchwork nature of mathematical problem-solving, where breakthroughs are context-dependent and not necessarily indicative of a single, cohesive narrative.