ANTITHESIS
A key argument against deontological ethics is its rigidity and potential to lead to morally counterintuitive outcomes. By prioritizing duty and adherence to rules over consequences, deontological ethics can result in actions that are morally questionable or even harmful. For example, if lying is always considered wrong, one might refuse to lie even to save a life, leading to avoidable harm. This inflexibility fails to account for the complexity of real-world situations, where moral rules may conflict or where breaking a rule could lead to a greater good. Critics argue that a more nuanced approach, which considers both intentions and consequences, is necessary for ethical decision-making.