Normative ethical theories

View Branch

Normative ethical theories provide frameworks for determining what actions are morally right or wrong. The main types are:

1. Deontological Ethics: Focuses on duty and rules. Actions are judged based on their adherence to these duties, regardless of consequences (e.g., Kant's Categorical Imperative).

2. Consequentialism: Judges actions by their outcomes. The most well-known form is Utilitarianism, which seeks the greatest good for the greatest number.

3. Virtue Ethics: Emphasizes character and virtues rather than rules or outcomes. It asks what a virtuous person would do in a given situation (e.g., Aristotle's emphasis on virtues like courage and wisdom).

4. Rights-Based Ethics: Centers on the rights of individuals. Actions are right if they respect and protect these rights (e.g., human rights theories).

Each theory offers a different lens for evaluating moral decisions.

View Branch

Virtue Ethics shifts the focus from rigid rules or outcomes to the moral character of the individual. Rooted in Aristotle's philosophy, it emphasizes cultivating virtues—such as courage, honesty, and compassion—as the foundation for ethical behavior. Instead of asking, "What should I do?" it asks, "What kind of person should I be?"

Key points: - Eudaimonia: The ultimate goal is flourishing or living well, achieved through virtuous living. - Golden Mean: Virtues are often found as a balance between extremes (e.g., courage is the mean between recklessness and cowardice). - Practical Wisdom (Phronesis): The ability to discern the right action in specific contexts, developed through experience and reflection.

Virtue Ethics is less prescriptive than deontological or consequentialist approaches, focusing on moral growth and the complexity of human life. Critics argue it can be vague or culturally relative, but proponents value its emphasis on character and the holistic nature of ethical living.

View Branch