How does the philosophical sublime intersect with quantum physics and which philosophers explore this connection
We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Sublime, Quantum Strange-ness, and Who Thinks About It
How they intersect (concise):
- Epistemic limit: Quantum theory exposes limits of classical representation and intuition (indeterminacy, nonlocality, complementarity). This mirrors the classical/sense-based sublime (Kant) where imagination is overwhelmed and reason grasps ideas beyond representation.
- Aesthetic/emotional: Quantum phenomena often provoke awe, perplexity, or “awe + fear” responses—the affective core of the sublime (Burke/Kant) updated for micro- and conceptual scales.
- Conceptual/unpresentable: Postmodern accounts of the sublime treat the unpresentable (that which cannot be pictured or fully narrated). Quantum mechanics—wavefunctions, superposition, entanglement—serves as a paradigmatic “unpresentable” that challenges language and representation (Lyotard).
- Ontological/ethical: Some contemporary theorists read quantum theory as showing deep entanglement of observer and world, prompting new philosophical stances about agency, responsibility, and interconnectedness that have a quasi-sublime dimension (e.g., Barad).
Key thinkers and useful texts
- Immanuel Kant, Critique of Judgment (1790) — classical account of the mathematical and dynamical sublime; standard starting point.
- Edmund Burke, A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of Our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful (1757) — physiological/affective account of the sublime.
- Jean‑François Lyotard, Lessons on the Analytic of the Sublime (1988/1994 trans.) and The Postmodern Condition (1979) — develops a postmodern “sublime” tied to the unpresentable and to science/technology; explicitly used to think about how conceptual advances outrun representation.
- Robert P. Crease & Charles C. Mann / Alfred Scharff Goldhaber — Crease’s writings (e.g. The Quantum Moment: How Planck, Bohr, Einstein, and Heisenberg Taught Us to Love Uncertainty, 2004) examine the cultural/aesthetic impact of quantum ideas.
- Werner Heisenberg, Physics and Philosophy (1958) — a physicist’s philosophical reflections linking quantum theory to limits of knowledge and classical concepts (resonant with sublime themes).
- Karen Barad, Meeting the Universe Halfway (2007) — uses quantum physics (especially Bohr) to develop an ontological/ethical framework (agential realism); not framed as “sublime” but pertinent for its rethinking of boundaries and agency.
- Slavoj Žižek, The Sublime Object of Ideology (1989) — Lacanian reinterpretation of the sublime; Žižek sometimes links such categories to science’s paradoxes.
- Timothy Morton, Hyperobjects (2013) — treats entities so vast or distributed they exceed cognition (a contemporary, ecological form of the sublime); useful for thinking analogously about quantum-scale weirdness.
- Arthur I. Miller, Einstein, Picasso: Space, Time and the Beauty That Causes Havoc (2001) — cultural connections between modern art and modern physics; useful for aesthetic-sublime readings.
Suggested way to read further
- Start with Kant (sublime) and Heisenberg (quantum-philosophy) to grasp the classical link (limits of representation).
- Read Lyotard for a direct philosophical program that ties the sublime to the sciences and the “unpresentable.”
- Consult Barad and Crease for contemporary treatments that bring quantum theory into ethical/ontological and cultural-aesthetic discussion.
Selected citations (for follow-up)
- Kant, I. Critique of Judgment.
- Burke, E. A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of Our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful.
- Lyotard, J.-F. Lessons on the Analytic of the Sublime (trans. A. Lingis).
- Heisenberg, W. Physics and Philosophy.
- Crease, R.P. & Goldhaber, A.S. The Quantum Moment (2004).
- Barad, K. Meeting the Universe Halfway (2007).
- Žižek, S. The Sublime Object of Ideology (1989).
- Morton, T. Hyperobjects (2013).
If you want, I can (a) give a short annotated reading order, (b) extract specific passages where Lyotard or Kant speak most directly to quantum themes, or (c) sketch a brief essay outline arguing that quantum theory produces a new form of the sublime. Which would help you most?