ANTITHESIS
A key argument against Kant’s view is that it leads to skepticism about the noumenal world. If our experience is entirely shaped by innate mental structures, we have no way of knowing whether these structures correspond to reality “as it is.” This creates an unbridgeable gap between the phenomenal and noumenal worlds, rendering the latter entirely unknowable. Critics argue that this undermines the possibility of objective knowledge, as we are left with no way to verify whether our mental categories align with reality. Furthermore, if our cognitive framework is entirely subjective, it becomes unclear how shared, intersubjective understanding of the world is possible, as Kant’s framework struggles to explain why different minds would structure reality in the same way.