The pressing question—“Who watches the watchers?”—acknowledges that even the systems developed to identify and correct bias must be themselves subject to rigorous oversight. The answer lies in establishing independent, multi-layered accountability frameworks that include:

1. Independent Oversight Bodies: These organizations, separate from the platform and its operational team, can conduct impartial audits of algorithms and decision-making practices.

2. Transparent Regulatory Frameworks: Publicly accessible standards and policies ensure that algorithmic adjustments and oversight practices are continuously evaluated against societal values.

3. Community and Stakeholder Participation: Involving users, ethicists, and diverse external experts creates a system of checks and balances that prevents overcorrection and safeguards against embedded bias.

4. Continuous Ethical Deliberation: Ongoing dialogue between designers, regulators, and community representatives helps adjust oversight measures in light of evolving societal norms.

By integrating these layers of accountability, platforms can better navigate the complex task of balancing bias correction with the risk of overcorrection, ensuring that the rules governing digital ethics are themselves guided by robust, ethical oversight.